Overall Score
One 0–100 number per stock, blending fundamental quality (40%), technical trend state (25%), the scorecard's propensity to beat peers (20%) and a risk penalty (15%). Every component is normalised before blending, and missing components are dropped with the remaining weights renormalised.
| # | Ticker | Company | Overall | Qual | Tech | Prop | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ANN | Ansell Limited | 84.5 | 72 | 97 | 100 | 78 |
| 2 | CDA | Codan Limited | 83.8 | 77 | 99 | 98 | 57 |
| 3 | MLX | Metals X Limited | 83.5 | 82 | 99 | 100 | 41 |
| 4 | APW | Aims Property Securities Fund | 82.7 | 92 | 70 | — | 77 |
| 5 | NWH | NRW Holdings Limited | 81.0 | 75 | 93 | 87 | 69 |
| 6 | SKS | SKS Technologies Group Limited | 80.6 | 74 | 100 | 100 | 41 |
| 7 | CCL | Cuscal Limited | 80.3 | 65 | 100 | 87 | 80 |
| 8 | TEA | Tasmea Limited | 80.2 | 70 | 99 | 95 | 55 |
| 9 | IPG | IPD Group Limited | 79.9 | 78 | 93 | — | 63 |
| 10 | SHA | SHAPE Australia Corporation Limited | 79.9 | 75 | 94 | — | 69 |
| 11 | LYL | Lycopodium Limited | 79.4 | 69 | 99 | — | 73 |
| 12 | SFR | Sandfire Resources Limited | 79.4 | 86 | 78 | 92 | 49 |
| 13 | SRG | SRG Global Limited | 79.4 | 74 | 93 | 84 | 67 |
| 14 | WAT | Waterco Limited | 79.0 | 78 | 84 | — | 74 |
| 15 | PYC | PYC Therapeutics Limited | 78.6 | 70 | 94 | 100 | 49 |
| 16 | PRU | Perseus Mining Limited | 78.3 | 85 | 75 | 87 | 54 |
| 17 | CGS | Cogstate Limited | 77.6 | 74 | 95 | — | 59 |
| 18 | EMR | Emerald Resources NL | 77.5 | 89 | 70 | 100 | 30 |
| 19 | BLS | BLS Pharmaceuticals Limited | 77.3 | 85 | 88 | — | 38 |
| 20 | A1M | AIC Mines Limited | 76.9 | 84 | 96 | — | 25 |
| 21 | KOA | The Koala Company Limited | 76.9 | 73 | 94 | — | 60 |
| 22 | ORE | Orezone Gold Corporation | 76.8 | 85 | 98 | — | 19 |
| 23 | MAH | Macmahon Holdings Limited | 76.6 | 71 | 81 | 100 | 54 |
| 24 | SIQ | Smartgroup Corporation Ltd | 76.6 | 70 | 69 | 100 | 75 |
| 25 | FPR | FleetPartners Group Limited | 76.4 | 65 | 100 | — | 68 |
| Decile | Obs | Avg 63d return | Median | Win rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 top | 308 | 2.29% | 0.95% | 53.2% |
| 2 | 323 | 3.44% | 0.0% | 49.5% |
| 3 | 312 | 3.74% | 2.05% | 54.2% |
| 4 | 325 | 5.12% | 2.9% | 57.5% |
| 5 | 321 | 2.48% | 0.51% | 51.1% |
| 6 | 315 | 7.77% | 2.46% | 56.8% |
| 7 | 322 | 4.47% | 0.53% | 50.3% |
| 8 | 315 | 3.0% | 0.41% | 50.8% |
| 9 | 320 | 7.36% | 3.35% | 58.1% |
| 10 bottom | 330 | 7.79% | 1.83% | 53.3% |
Top minus bottom decile: -5.5% over 63 days, across 22 rebalance dates and 148 stocks.
Each date is ranked only against itself, so this is point-in-time by construction. Important limitation: Price-based components only — see docstring. Fundamentals get restated and the scorecard is fitted on the full sample, so neither can be honestly reconstructed for past dates. Treat this as evidence about the price-based half of the score; the full score has to prove itself going forward, which is what the tracked history above is for.